MEGAN HUGHES questions whether we judge female athletes more on the way they look rather than on their ability on the field.
Lent Term sees the emergence of fervent Cambridge loyalty revived, as many of the University’s sports teams clash against their mortal enemies, their opponents from The Other Place, in a series of Varsity matches.
As this partisan fever sweeps the faculties, so students find themselves exposed to increased coverage of sporting endeavours and achievements. For those who represent the University in their sport of choice, this is is a refreshing and encouraging phenomenon, as are the reports of success for men and women alike which flood our student newspapers.
It seems, however, that such a phenomenon also reveals a darker side of student culture. Last week, I wrote a report on the Cambridge Women’s Football Team’s emphatic victory over their Oxford counterparts in the League, an achievement which both exceeded expectations and sent out a strong message ahead of their Varsity game. Whilst I was encouraged by congratulations from those friends who tendentially remain wholly unconnected from the world of football, I was disheartened to see that the first comment on the article was one which swept aside the players’ success, and instead focused upon the appearance of one girl.
The comment, since removed, suggested that the offending party had taken a particularly vulgar liking to one footballer shown in the picture, though not in so many words. Admittedly, it was crude, base, and demonstrated a complete absence of wit on the part of the commenter, yet that doesn’t detract from the fact that it was made. It angered me that some oafish troll had taken it upon themselves to crack a joke, at the expense of a team who had grafted hard to pummel Oxford. It might have been coarse and unintelligent, but ultimately the fact that the comment ostensibly had the power to undermine such a brilliant victory left a sour taste in my mouth.
![]()
CUWAFC, exhausted after their Varsity win on Saturday
It’s not simply one off-hand comment, either. On its own, such a remark wouldn’t be particularly damaging, but it reflects the harmful culture which seems to characterise the modern attitude to sport in this country. As athletes gain public acclaim, so they begin to blur the lines between celebrated sportsperson and celebrity. It is perhaps this trend within popular culture, of regarding successful athletes as superheroic, and of transferring them from the realm of sport to that of celebrity culture, which has engendered an increasingly common phenomenon: the judgement of athletes based upon the aesthetic, rather than sporting prowess.
The most distinct manifestation of such a trend came to the fore during the Olympics last summer. Jessica Ennis was not only an Olympic gold medallist in the heptathlon, but ran the 110m hurdles in a time which would have seen her clinch gold four years earlier in Beijing, a seismic achievement. Yet whilst the public bowed down to her triumphs on the track and field, she drew another crowd of admirers. It was this contingent which created the Facebook page ‘Jessica Ennis Bum’, now boasting an astonishing 125,000 likes and counting. This born in mind, it seems apt that we pose the question of whether all public recognition is a positive force, particularly in the case of physical appearance.
![]()
Jessica Ennis winning the 800m in the London Olympics
It would be foolish to argue that we shouldn’t judge others based upon physical appearance; it’s a fundamental and instinctive characteristic of human nature. More than this, I can already imagine people pointing out that, surely, any appreciation of somebody’s beauty can’t be a negative concept. Perhaps it can’t, in itself. Yet we live in a writhing, organic society whose members are all cyberly inter-connected, and neither remarks nor events can be viewed in isolation. If it becomes acceptable, even conventional, to scrutinise attractive athletes on the grounds of their aesthetic, it will inevitably become the norm to criticise those who are less conventionally good-looking on those very same grounds.
Athletes often sacrifice a lot to reach the top of that game, not solely in terms of commitment, but often in terms of appearance. Whether it be a Cambridge Rugby Blue with cauliflower ears or a female weight-lifter competing at world-level, modern athletes commonly develop corporeal and facial features which distinguish them from the established ‘ideal’ aesthetic of beauty. What gives us the right to condemn them for such physical differences? Pretty much nothing, in my book. Even in those instances where sportspeople are admired for their looks, an ostensibly positive assessment, such a judgement is symptomatic of the noxious streak in contemporary British sporting culture.
I know this argument isn’t going to be particularly popular, it’s going against the grain, but then I wouldn’t be writing it if it weren’t. I also know that there are many Cambridge students who don’t adhere to the cultural trend that I’ve discussed, who most probably make up the majority. It just seemed a shame that a place like Cambridge could harbour such injurious attitudes; in an ideal world, whenever we read about a Blues victory, we’d be more likely to applaud their achievement on the pitch than their appearance off it.
Fit to Compete?
MEGAN HUGHES questions whether we judge female athletes more on the way they look rather than on their ability on the field.
Lent Term sees the emergence of fervent Cambridge loyalty revived, as many of the University’s sports teams clash against their mortal enemies, their opponents from The Other Place, in a series of Varsity matches.
As this partisan fever sweeps the faculties, so students find themselves exposed to increased coverage of sporting endeavours and achievements. For those who represent the University in their sport of choice, this is is a refreshing and encouraging phenomenon, as are the reports of success for men and women alike which flood our student newspapers.
It seems, however, that such a phenomenon also reveals a darker side of student culture. Last week, I wrote a report on the Cambridge Women’s Football Team’s emphatic victory over their Oxford counterparts in the League, an achievement which both exceeded expectations and sent out a strong message ahead of their Varsity game. Whilst I was encouraged by congratulations from those friends who tendentially remain wholly unconnected from the world of football, I was disheartened to see that the first comment on the article was one which swept aside the players’ success, and instead focused upon the appearance of one girl.
The comment, since removed, suggested that the offending party had taken a particularly vulgar liking to one footballer shown in the picture, though not in so many words. Admittedly, it was crude, base, and demonstrated a complete absence of wit on the part of the commenter, yet that doesn’t detract from the fact that it was made. It angered me that some oafish troll had taken it upon themselves to crack a joke, at the expense of a team who had grafted hard to pummel Oxford. It might have been coarse and unintelligent, but ultimately the fact that the comment ostensibly had the power to undermine such a brilliant victory left a sour taste in my mouth.
CUWAFC, exhausted after their Varsity win on Saturday
It’s not simply one off-hand comment, either. On its own, such a remark wouldn’t be particularly damaging, but it reflects the harmful culture which seems to characterise the modern attitude to sport in this country. As athletes gain public acclaim, so they begin to blur the lines between celebrated sportsperson and celebrity. It is perhaps this trend within popular culture, of regarding successful athletes as superheroic, and of transferring them from the realm of sport to that of celebrity culture, which has engendered an increasingly common phenomenon: the judgement of athletes based upon the aesthetic, rather than sporting prowess.
The most distinct manifestation of such a trend came to the fore during the Olympics last summer. Jessica Ennis was not only an Olympic gold medallist in the heptathlon, but ran the 110m hurdles in a time which would have seen her clinch gold four years earlier in Beijing, a seismic achievement. Yet whilst the public bowed down to her triumphs on the track and field, she drew another crowd of admirers. It was this contingent which created the Facebook page ‘Jessica Ennis Bum’, now boasting an astonishing 125,000 likes and counting. This born in mind, it seems apt that we pose the question of whether all public recognition is a positive force, particularly in the case of physical appearance.
Jessica Ennis winning the 800m in the London Olympics
It would be foolish to argue that we shouldn’t judge others based upon physical appearance; it’s a fundamental and instinctive characteristic of human nature. More than this, I can already imagine people pointing out that, surely, any appreciation of somebody’s beauty can’t be a negative concept. Perhaps it can’t, in itself. Yet we live in a writhing, organic society whose members are all cyberly inter-connected, and neither remarks nor events can be viewed in isolation. If it becomes acceptable, even conventional, to scrutinise attractive athletes on the grounds of their aesthetic, it will inevitably become the norm to criticise those who are less conventionally good-looking on those very same grounds.
Athletes often sacrifice a lot to reach the top of that game, not solely in terms of commitment, but often in terms of appearance. Whether it be a Cambridge Rugby Blue with cauliflower ears or a female weight-lifter competing at world-level, modern athletes commonly develop corporeal and facial features which distinguish them from the established ‘ideal’ aesthetic of beauty. What gives us the right to condemn them for such physical differences? Pretty much nothing, in my book. Even in those instances where sportspeople are admired for their looks, an ostensibly positive assessment, such a judgement is symptomatic of the noxious streak in contemporary British sporting culture.
I know this argument isn’t going to be particularly popular, it’s going against the grain, but then I wouldn’t be writing it if it weren’t. I also know that there are many Cambridge students who don’t adhere to the cultural trend that I’ve discussed, who most probably make up the majority. It just seemed a shame that a place like Cambridge could harbour such injurious attitudes; in an ideal world, whenever we read about a Blues victory, we’d be more likely to applaud their achievement on the pitch than their appearance off it.
Preview: millennium baby
CAMBRIDGE
I talked to the cast and crew behind Cambridge’s new coming-of-age play
Do you miss out if you go to an outer Cambridge college?
CAMBRIDGE
What if I’m not the main character?!
Five reasons why Medwards is the best college at Cambridge University
CAMBRIDGE
There’s more to us than ‘that one on the hill’
‘Students were not being used as pawns’: The key take-aways from the UCU open meeting
CAMBRIDGE
The fight back against casual, insecure working conditions continues
Double trouble: The twin experience at university
CAMBRIDGE
A reflection on the university experience as a twin
Fitz Winter Ball is giving May Balls a run for their money
CAMBRIDGE
With Tinchy Stryder headlining, Fitz Winter Ball is the ‘Number 1’ event happening in Michaelmas
I asked ChatGPT your Cambridge Freshers’ Week questions
CAMBRIDGE
Turns out AI has some pretty useful advice
Quality over quantity: How to hack Cambridge
CAMBRIDGE
Work smarter, not harder
How to matricu-slay: A reflection on my matriculation at Cambridge University
CAMBRIDGE
Its official! I’ve entered the depths of hell…I mean Cambridge
Cambridge University’s King’s College covered in orange paint in Just Stop Oil protest
CAMBRIDGE
The demonstration is one of a series of attacks on UK universities such as Manchester and University College London
Seven things I’ve learnt as a Cambridge Fresher
CAMBRIDGE
In the words of Danny Dyer – what have I got meself into?
University of Cambridge is nothing without its students
CAMBRIDGE
We need to give ourselves more credit; University of Cambridge is nothing without us
Sandi Toksvig appointed Qantabrigian Bye-Fellow at Christ’s College
CAMBRIDGE
Sightings of former bake-off star around Cambridge explained
College Parenthood: What to expect when you’re expecting
CAMBRIDGE
Putting the fun into dysfunctional family
Six things I learnt about Cambridge when visiting other universities
CAMBRIDGE
The Cambridge quirks become so obvious!
From freebies to societies, how to make the most of Cambridge’s Freshers’ Fair
CAMBRIDGE
Going once is never enough
Overrated: The Cambridge experience
CAMBRIDGE
Status: hungover. Workload: too much. Feeling: burnt out.
Student activists arrested for Schlumberger protest
CAMBRIDGE
OCRA and XR activists were apprehended by police
Five things you might not realise about living in Cambridge year round
CAMBRIDGE
Moving every item across main site makes life worth living
Your guide to surviving Cambridge Freshers’ Week
CAMBRIDGE
The excuse ‘I’m just a silly fresh’ will be your best friend
A dramatic recap of the Whole Zara McDermott and Sam Thompson cheating scandal
UK
Remember when she kept posting open love notes on Instagram to him?
Co-star romances and age-gap relationships: All of Paul Hollywood’s biggest controversies
UK
He’s back handing out handshakes on another series of The Great British Bake Off
Boo! These are officially the most haunted UK unis in 2023, based on ghost sightings
UK
There have been 59 ghost sightings at one UK uni
MAFS gossip column: Jordan responds to fight scandal and cast knew each other before the show?!
UK
The drama really never ends!
Ella has been ‘lined up’ by PrettyLittleThing to be the brand’s first ever transgender model
UK
Big moves!
Tour buses and family dramas: A brief history of One Direction’s run-ins with the law
UK
Liam Payne has just had his driver’s license suspended
There’s been a huge The Fall of the House of Usher clue staring us in the face this whole time
UK
This is so CLEVER
‘You’re scared to step outside’: Two women share their stories of being stalked at uni
UK
This doesn’t only happen to celebrities like Holly Willoughby
Another one! People spot a further editing error in MAFS questioning a staged dinner
UK
Nothing is sacred anymore
‘It’s not funny’: Love Actually’s creator has finally addressed the film’s fatphobia
UK
Justice for Natalie
Um, the video of Georges squatting has been revealed and you absolutely have to watch it
UK
Give this man all the baguettes
Attention pickpocket! The uni cities where you’re most likely to have your phone stolen
UK
I’m switching back to a Nokia brick after this
Meet Lauren Sintes: The 27-year-old model joining the cast of Made in Chelsea
UK
Of course she’s well connected with most of the cast
Rugby boys and the cleaning rota: Just 19 uni things that are none of my business
UK
The hygiene rating of my fave kebab shop has nothing to do with me!
From secret hookups to cheating: All the biggest bombshells from the Love Is Blind reunion
UK
I’m in shock at all of these
Why do posh people sleep with all their mates? A very serious investigation
UK
The Made in Chelsea mayhem has gone on long enough
Shona says she and Brad were together for six weeks after MAFS but split as he didn’t change
UK
‘I woke the hell up’
‘You’ve made a c*** of yourself’: Shona shares off-screen chat that saw Brad axed from MAFS
UK
‘Bradley said he was behaving like a caged animal’
MAFS UK star Chanita Stephenson calls out the current cast for being a ‘bit too wild!’
UK
She thinks they’re on the show ‘for fun’ and are not ‘focusing on their marriages’
‘Go f**k yourself’: Luke calls out ‘snake’ in MAFS cast who ‘sold’ story of him having a fight
UK
It was revealed today Luke has been removed from the show following a physical fight
Luke has been AXED from Married at First Sight UK following physical fight with Jordan
UK
The incident was caught on camera